Trump envoy credits colorful rhetoric and vodka shots in helping him build bond with Belarus leader

WASHINGTON (AP) — PresidentDonald Trump'sspecial envoy to Belarus recently revealed that he helped ingratiate himself with the country's autocratic leader by echoingAlexander Lukashenko'sdisdain for Europe with vulgar language and by negotiating his way through a boozy lunch during their first meeting.

Associated Press FILE - U.S. Presidential envoy John Coale, speaks to journalists outside the U.S. Embassy in Vilnius, Lithuania, Sept. 11, 2025, ahead of the arrival of released prisoners from Belarus. (AP Photo/Mindaugas Kulbis, file) In this photo released by Belarusian presidential press service, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, right, and U.S. Presidential envoy John Coale talk during their meeting in Minsk, Belarus, Thursday, March 19, 2026. (Belarusian Presidential Press Service via AP)

United States Belarus

The envoy, John Coale, who has been charged with working to win the release of hundreds of political prisoners from the East European country, said State Department officials advised him before the initial meeting with Lukashenko that he likes to "yuck it up, so we yucked it up."

"About a half-hour, 45 minutes into it, I am trying to get the feel of who this guy is and how to communicate," Coale said at a recent appearance at Arizona State University's McCain Institute. "He starts complaining about the Europeans — Europeans this, Europeans that. So — and this is kind of crude and I'm sorry for the language — but I said to him, 'Yeah, they're a bunch of p———.' So, I had him in my hand from then on."

Coale offered the anecdote as a window into his efforts to build a relationship with the Belarusian leader, who is closely tied toRussian President Vladimir Putinand has sought to improve relations with the West since Trump's return to the White House.

Coale in an interview on Wednesday defended his rhetoric. "If I have to use locker room language to get 500 political prisoners released, I will do it every time," he told The Associated Press.

In 2016, a recording of Trump using the same vulgarity caused a major controversy during the president's first run for the White House, leading to a rare apology from Trump, who described it as private "locker room talk."

Coale says his 'very direct' diplomacy is reaping benefits

To be certain, Coale is not the first U.S. diplomat to use less than diplomatic language about Europeans.

In 2014,Victoria Nuland, at the time the top U.S. diplomat for European and Eurasian affairs, apologized after a recording of a snippet of private conversation leaked in which she used salty language to vent about Europe's hesitant policy over the pro-democracy protests in Ukraine. In 2003, State Department spokesmanRichard Boucherfaced heat in the early months of the Iraq War for dismissively referring to France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg — countries that opposed U.S. policy in Iraq — as the "chocolate makers."

And Trump hassparred with European leadersover a long list of issues, including tariffs, contributions to NATO and his desire to acquire Greenland.

Coale, a Maryland attorney, was appointed by Trump in March 2025 as his deputy special envoy to Ukraine. In June, he help win the release of 14 political prisoners from Belarus. Months later, Trump announced he was elevating Coale to serve as his special envoy to Belarus. He is married to TV journalist Greta Van Susteren.

The envoy, during a conference on hostage-taking and arbitrary detention hosted by the non-profit think tank named after the late Sen. John McCain, made the case that his "very direct" diplomacy is reaping benefits with Lukashenko.

Lukashenkohas ruled the nationof 9.5 million with an iron fist for more than three decades, and the country has been sanctionedrepeatedly by Western countries— both for its political oppression and for allowing Moscow to use its territory in the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Advertisement

Belarus has released hundreds of political prisoners in exchange for sanctions relief since Trump returned to the White House as Lukashenko has sought to build better relations with the U.S. under the Republican leader.

Coale said his first meeting with Lukashenko stretched into a two-hour lunch, during which he poured shots of vodka on to the floor when his host wasn't looking to avoid becoming intoxicated. Coale joked he managed to limit himself to two shots, but said that some of his State Department colleagues who joined him at the meeting drank many more.

"All these toasts started — I can't get hammered," Coale said. "Of course, there were a couple State Department guys who drank all eight toasts and they were hammered."

Lukashenko pardoned more prisoners last week after a Minsk meeting with Coale

Lukashenko's rule was challenged after a 2020 presidential election, when tens of thousandspoured into the streetsto protest a vote they viewed as rigged. They were the largest demonstrations since Belarus became independent following the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union.

In an ensuing crackdown, tens of thousands were detained, with many beaten by police. Prominent opposition figures either fled the country or were imprisoned.

Five years after the mass demonstrations,Lukashenko won a seventh termlast year in an election that the opposition called a farce.

More recently, Belarus has freed some political prisoners to try to win favor with the West, includingNobel Peace Prize laureate Ales Bialiatskiand prominent opposition figuresSiarhei Tsikhanouski,Viktar Babaryka and Maria Kolesnikova.

Last week, Lukashenkoordered the release of 250 political prisonersas part of a deal with Washington that lifted some U.S. sanctions, the latest step in the isolated leader's effort to improve ties with the West. It was the largest one-time release of political prisoners in the country.

Lukashenko pardoned the prisoners after meeting with Coale in Minsk. Coale hailed the release as a "significant humanitarian milestone" and a testament to Trump's "commitment to direct, hard-nosed diplomacy."

The McCain Institute event took place days before the latest release of political prisoners. Coale predicted then that the Trump administration would be able to win the release of all of political prisoners by the end of the year.

"I'd be willing to bet on that," said Coale, who added he was planning additional trips to Belarus in the near future that he expected to result in the release of a "couple hundred" more political prisoners. "I think this type of diplomacy that Donald Trump has pushed forward does work."

AP Diplomatic Writer Matt Lee contributed to this report.

Trump envoy credits colorful rhetoric and vodka shots in helping him build bond with Belarus leader

WASHINGTON (AP) — PresidentDonald Trump'sspecial envoy to Belarus recently revealed that he helped ingratiate himself...
Verdicts against social media companies carry consequences. But questions linger

SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — Two landmark juryverdicts against social media companies have arrivedat the front of a wave of lawsuits alleging that the popular platforms endanger the mental health of children.

Associated Press Meta attorney Kevin Huff makes closing arguments, Monday, March 23, 2026, in state court, in Santa Fe, N.M., in a trial where the social media conglomerate is accused of misleading its users about how safe its platforms are for children. (Eddie Moore/The Albuquerque Journal via AP, Pool) El juez Bryan Biedscheid habla con Linda Singer, abogada de la parte demandante, y con el abogado Kevin Huff, que representa a Meta, el lunes 23 de marzo de 2026, en un tribunal estatal, en Santa Fe, Nuevo México, en un juicio en el que se acusa al conglomerado de redes sociales de engañar a sus usuarios sobre lo seguras que son sus plataformas para los niños. (Eddie Moore/The Albuquerque Journal vía AP, Pool) A recording of Meta Founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg's deposition is played for the jurors on Wednesday, March 4, 2026, in Santa Fe, N.M. (Jim Weber/Santa Fe New Mexican via AP, Pool)

Meta New Mexico Trial

Financial penalties total $381 million in the two cases involving tech giant Meta in New Mexico and both Meta and YouTube in California. The verdictshighlight a growing shift in the public perceptionof social media companies and their responsibilities toward child safety.

But it may be too soon to tell whether litigation will change the way popular social media and messaging platforms function — or influence the complex algorithms that deliver content to billions of users worldwide.

Here are looming questions as related lawsuits approach trial.

Will these verdicts harm Meta's business?

The answer is not really — or, at least, not yet.

Meta — the owner of Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp — says it had $201 billion in sales last year.

That revenue stream dwarfs the $375 million in civil penaltiesimposed on Tuesday by a jury in New Mexicowith a verdict that Meta knowinglyharmed children's mental healthand concealed what it knew about child sexual exploitation on its social media platforms.

Meta said it disagrees with the verdicts and plans to appeal the jury's finding that it violated the state Unfair Practices Act.

And tech companies still are shielded from legal responsibility for posted content, based onSection 230of the 1996 Communications Decency Act.

Investors are shrugging off the verdicts. Meta's stock closed slightly higher Wednesday, although it is down about 8% year-to-date.

Does Meta have to make changes now to its design or algorithm?

The verdicts this week don't mandate specific changes to the design of social media platforms, nor to the algorithms that make them tick.

But a second phase of the New Mexico trial in May, before a judge with no jury, could spell out changes for Meta's platforms for local users by court order.

Advertisement

A state district court judge will determine whether Meta created a public nuisance — and could impose restrictions and order the company to pay for programs that remedy potential harms to children.

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, who filed the lawsuit against Meta in 2023, says his office wants improvements to Meta's enforcement of minimum age limits and removal of sexual predators — in part by lifting encryption on communication that can interfere with police work.

Meta says it continuously works to improve safety and already has made changes that phase out encryption on Instagram and limit access to explicit content by teenagers, block unsolicited messages to children from adults and help young users manage time spent on its platforms and avoid sleep disruptions.

Both the California and New Mexico trials highlighted the addictive properties of platform algorithms and the negative impacts on child mental health.

How much money do Meta and YouTube have to pay?

In New Mexico, a jury in Santa Fe arrived at the $375 million fine against Meta by endorsing the maximum penalty of $5,000 per violation of state consumer protection law — multiplied by thousands of social media accounts for children under 18.

Prosecutors intend to pursue more damages in that trial's second phase, while an appeal could delay payment — or reverse penalties.

In California, the jury ruled that Meta and Google's video streaming platform YouTube must pay at least $3 million in damages to a 20-year-old woman who says she became addicted to social media as a child, exacerbating her mental health struggles.TikTok and Snap settledbefore the trial began.

California jurors recommended an additional $3 million in punitive damages pending a judge's final review.

Google defends YouTube as a responsibly built streaming platform, and not a social media site.

More trials to come on social media safety

The California verdict has much broader legal and financial implications. The case was designated as a bellwether test that might guide the resolution of other lawsuits. There are thousands of those lawsuits pending, including hundreds in California.

The New Mexico verdict may be an early indicator for lawsuits brought by other publicly elected prosecutors.

Attorneys general in more than 40 states have filed suit against Meta, claiming it is contributing to a mental health crisis among young people. Most are pursuing remedies in U.S. federal court.

Verdicts against social media companies carry consequences. But questions linger

SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — Two landmark juryverdicts against social media companies have arrivedat the front of a wave of laws...
9-year-old who pleaded to go to spelling bee released from ICE detention

A 9-year-old boy who begged to be released from an immigration detention center so he could attend his state spelling bee has been freed with his family, their lawyer said Wednesday.

NBC Universal Deiver with his parents. (Corey Sullivan Martin)

Deiver Henao Jimenez made the plea duringa video call this month with children's entertainer Ms. Rachel, whose real name is Rachel Accurso.

"I don't want to be here anymore," Deiver said on the call, which was latershared on Accurso's social media pages. "Nothing is good here."

He and his parents, asylum seekers from Colombia, had beenheld at the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in South Texassince early March, when they were detained during a routine immigration check-in in New Mexico,according to their lawyer, Corey Sullivan Martin.

ICE freed the family on humanitarian parole Wednesday, about a week after Martin filed a request for their release and daysafter NBC News reported on their case.

Deiver Henao-Jimenez finished third in a Spanish spelling bee held by Las Cruces Public Schools. (Las Cruces Public Schools)

His elementary school principal wrote a letter in mid-March supporting the family's release, which was later delivered to immigration officials, describing Deiver as "a dedicated student with excellent attendance and high marks."

Sullivan Martin said Deiver is eager to return to school, rejoin his gifted and talented classes and get back to practicing his spelling words.

"I don't see how it was necessary at all to detain a child who was doing exactly what we want children to do," Sullivan Martin said.

Advertisement

The family planned to return to New Mexico, she said, where they will continue checking in with immigration officials while their case proceeds.

More on this topic

The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Deiver's release came a day afterICE freed another child whose case drew widespread attentionfollowing a video call with Accurso. Gael, a 5-year-old boy with developmental disabilities, had experienced worsening medical issues while detained at Dilley, his parents said.

The facility has faced growing scrutiny from immigration lawyers and advocates, who say children there havestruggled to access adequate medical careand education in an environment where lights remain on around the clock and officers stand guard. Some families have described poor food and long waits for medical attention.

DHS has disputed those accounts, saying families are provided appropriate care in a facility designed for their needs.

After her video meetings with the children, Accurso — known for her signature pink headband and sing-song delivery — called for Dilley to be shut down and for families to be returned to their communities.

During their conversation, Deiver told Accurso he missed his friends and said the food at Dilley made his stomach hurt. But he was most worried about getting out in time to compete in New Mexico's state spelling bee in May, after earning a spot by placing third at a regional competition.

"We're trying to get a child out of a jail to do a spelling bee," Accurso said last week. "I just never thought those words would go together."

9-year-old who pleaded to go to spelling bee released from ICE detention

A 9-year-old boy who begged to be released from an immigration detention center so he could attend his state spelling bee...
'Tush push' safe for 2026 as submitted NFL rule proposals do not include controversial play

The tush push lives to see another season in the NFL.

Yahoo Sports PHILADELPHIA, PA - JANUARY 11: Jalen Hurts #1 of the Philadelphia Eagles rushes on a tush push during the NFC Wild Card playoff game against the San Francisco 49ers at Lincoln Financial Field on January 11, 2026 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The 49ers defeated the Eagles 23-19. (Photo by Michael Zagaris/San Francisco 49ers/Getty Images)

According toESPN's Adam Schefter, the controversial play will not be discussed during next week's NFL owner's meetings. Last month,Competition Committee co-chair Rich McKay saidthat no team had come forward with a proposal to alter or ban the play.

That doesn't mean the topic will go away forever.

"I don't know that it's the end of the debate,"McKay said, via Yahoo Sports' Jori Epstein. "I think there's still people who are concerned with the whole pushing element."

Advertisement

Draft your Yahoo Fantasy Baseball team for the 2026 MLB Season

The play has drawn plenty of criticism, and multiple attempts to ban it, in recent years after teams — notably the Philadelphia Eagles and Buffalo Bills — have found incredible success with it.

Last season was incredibly contentious, and the Green Bay Packers pushed the proposed ban during offseason meetings in 2025. But10 teams ended up voting against that ban, and it was two votes short of passing. In order for a rule change, the NFL requires approval from at least 24 of its 32 franchise owners. Eagles ownerJeffrie Lurie was among those fightingto keep the play in the league during discussions last time around.

According to ESPN, there were 112 attempted tush pushes during the 2025 season — which is 11 more than the 2024 campaign. The Eagles attempted the most (27) and the Bills were second (17). In total, teams successfully converted a first down on a tush push about 77% of the time.

There was plenty of outrage over the play this past season, too. The Eagles, for example, scored a touchdown on a tush push despiteofficials clearly missing a false starton the play during their game in September. The Jacksonville Jaguars were completely unable to stop Bills quarterback Josh Allen on an attempt in the playoffs. Allen ended up going 10 yards before he was brought down, and former official-turned-rules analyst forNBC and Amazon Terry McAuley lit up the league for it.

"I very much hope the NFL competition committee addresses this in the offseason," McAuley wrote last month. "This just cannot be a legal play any more. Now, only pulling a runner is illegal. All pushing, pulling or lifting a runner by a teammate should be illegal."

What rules NFL owners will discuss for 2026

Per Schefter, five proposals were sent to the NFL Competition Committee for discussion.

  • Permit the kicking team to declare an onside kick at any time during the game.

  • Eliminate the kicking team's incentive to intentionally kick the ball out of bounds when kicking off from the 50-yard line.

PITTSBURGH, PA - NOVEMBER 02: Indianapolis Colts punter Rigoberto Sanchez (8) with the onside kick attempt later in the fourth quarter of play during an NFL game between the Indianapolis Colts and the Pittsburgh Steelers on November 02, 2025 at Acrisure Stadium in Pittsburgh, PA. (Photo by Jeffrey Brown/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)
  • Modify the kickoff alignment requirements for the receiving team in the setup zone.

  • Allow League personnel to consult with on-field officials when considering disqualifications for both flagrant football acts and non-football acts without being called on the field.

  • For one year only, allow the NFL Officiating Department to correct clear and obvious misses by on-field officials that impact the game, in the event of a work stoppage involving the game officials represented by the NFL Referees Association.

'Tush push' safe for 2026 as submitted NFL rule proposals do not include controversial play

The tush push lives to see another season in the NFL. According toESPN's Adam Schefter, the controversial ...
Puka Nacua denies woman's claim that he made antisemitic comment, but says biting her was 'horseplay'

Puka Nacua has denied a woman's claim that he made an antisemitic comment, says the Rams wide receiver's attorney.

LA Times Los Angeles Rams' Puka Nacua arrives before football's NFL Honors award show in San Francisco, Thursday, Feb. 5, 2026.

Madison Atiabi made the claim this week in an application for a temporary restraining order obtained by The Times.

Atiabi asserted in the court filing that during a group New Year's Eve dinner, Nacua made an offensive remark about Jewish people "in a manner audible to [her] and others at the table." Atiabi added that Nacua's "vulgar, threatening, violent and harassing conduct" escalated as the evening progressed.

After dinner, Atiabi said she was in a car with Nacua and others when the Rams star bit her on the left shoulder, leaving a substantial bite mark that was photographed. Nacua also is alleged to have bitten the thumb of Atiabi's friend "so forcefully that she screamed in pain," according to the filing.

Nacua's attorney, Levi McCathern, said he has spoken to witnesses — including other Rams players who were present — who didn't hear Nacua make the antisemitic statement. He also said the bite was innocent "horseplay."

"Puka denies these allegations in the strongest possible terms," McCathern said. "We will pursue all available legal remedies in response to these false and damaging statements."

Read more:Rams' Puka Nacua apologizes for making offensive gesture on livestream

The request for a temporary restraining order was denied by a Los Angeles Superior Court judicial officer and a hearing is scheduled for April 14.

Advertisement

"Our office was contacted with demands of millions of dollars in exchange for not publicizing these allegations," McCathern told TMZ. "This is not a legitimate claim — it is blackmail."

In December, Nacua apologized for an antisemitic gesture he made while appearing on alivestream with Adin Ross and N3on.

The livestreamers, with Nacua out of earshot, discussed whether Nacua would get in trouble if he performed a move that references an offensive stereotype about Jewish people. Ross is Jewish, but he often performs the move in his livestreams.

They suggested Nacua, wholed the NFLwith 129 receptions and was named an All-Pro in 2025, perform the gesture the next time he scored a touchdown.

"At the time, I had no idea this act was antisemitic in nature and perpetuated hateful stereotypes against Jewish people," Nacua wrote in his post. "I deeply apologize to anyone who was offended by my actions as I do not stand for any form of racism, bigotry or hate of another group of people."

The Rams distanced themselves from Nacua's gesture in a statement.

"There is no place in this world for antisemitism as well as other forms of prejudice or hostility towards the Jewish people and people of any religion, ethnicity, or race," the team said.

Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report.

This story originally appeared inLos Angeles Times.

Puka Nacua denies woman's claim that he made antisemitic comment, but says biting her was 'horseplay'

Puka Nacua has denied a woman's claim that he made an antisemitic comment, says the Rams wide receiver's attorney...

 

NEO JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com