Category 1

Lakers’ Deandre Ayton ejected after 'unnecessary and excessive' elbow to Alperen Sengun

HOUSTON (AP) — Los Angeles Lakers center Deandre Ayton was ejected in the third quarter of Game 4 on Sunday night against the Houston Rockets after receiving a flagrant foul 2 for hitting Alperen Sengun in the face with his elbow and forearm.

Associated Press

A foul was called after Ayton hit Sengun when he had the ball and was heading toward the basket with about 5½ minutes left in the third quarter. The play was reviewed and upgraded to a flagrant foul 2 and Ayton was ejected.

The referee announcing the foul called the contact "unnecessary and excessive.”

Advertisement

The Lakers, who lead the series 3-0, trailed 76-57 at the time of the foul. Ayton led the team with 19 points and 10 rebounds when he was ejected.

AP NBA:https://apnews.com/NBA

Lakers’ Deandre Ayton ejected after 'unnecessary and excessive' elbow to Alperen Sengun

HOUSTON (AP) — Los Angeles Lakers center Deandre Ayton was ejected in the third quarter of Game 4 on Sunday night against the Houston R...
Correspondents’ dinner attendee goes viral for finishing meal amid shooting chaos

An attendee at the White House correspondents’ dinner has gone viral after cameras captured him continuing his meal as guests sheltered under tables from gun fire.

The Independent US

Inside the ballroom at the Washington Hilton hotel,Donald Trumpand vice president JD Vance were bundled off stage by secret service personnel while attendees scrambled for cover.

Advertisement

One guest sat near the stage, however, was seemingly unperturbed, remaining seated and continuing to eat from his plate as colleagues crouched under the table.

“How the hell is he eating when there is chaos?,” wondered one user onX, where the clip racked up over eight million views.

“Guarantee he said ‘im too old for this s***’,” offered another viewer. “Accepted whatever might come.”

Correspondents’ dinner attendee goes viral for finishing meal amid shooting chaos

An attendee at the White House correspondents’ dinner has gone viral after cameras captured him continuing his meal as guests sheltered...
The long history of America's conflict with Cuba

Next: Cuba? 08:20

CBS News

With so much attention onIranin recent weeks, you may have missed the news about the increasingly tense situation with another longtime adversary of the United States – one closer to home.

On April 13, while making remarks about the war in Iran, President Trump said, "We may stop by Cubaafter we're finished with this."

The U.S. hasblocked nearly all oil shipments into Cuba, pushing it to the brink of collapse. Meanwhile, high-level talks between the two countries are underway.

Mr. Trump hasn't offered details, but has said this: "All my life I've been hearing about the United States and Cuba: when will the United States do it? I do believe I'll be the honor, having the honor oftaking Cuba."

Why is Trump talking about action on Cuba and what could that look like?

The island nation just 90 miles from Florida has indeed played an outsized role in our foreign policy for close to 70 years. But back in the 1950s, most Americans thought of Cuba as little more than a hedonistic paradise.

It was "a playground where anything goes, where there are casinos, where there's prostitution … and to a great extent, that was true," said Jorge Malagon Marquez, a Cuban-American, and a professor of history at Miami Dade college. "You had celebrities like Frank Sinatra coming down. It's party time.

"What Americans weren't seeing was the dissatisfaction amongst regular Cubans running just below the surface," he said.

Many Cubans were subsisting, and working in industries outright owned by Americans. "Cubans loved Americans coming as tourists or what have you, but it was the control of the economy that really bothered them," Marquez said. And for many Cubans, memories were still fresh from half a century earlier when, after the Spanish American War, the U.S. won a "sort of" independence for Cuba in 1902.

But was Cuba really independent? "It's independence like independence I gave my teenage kids," laughed Marquez, "which means like, 'Sure, you're independent, so long as you're home by 10 o'clock.'"

Mo Rocca with Miami Dade College history professor Jorge Malagon Marquez, whose family fled Cuba in 1967.  / Credit: CBS News

Yes, Cuba was a sovereign nation, but the United States could intervene anytime its interests were at stake – which it did repeatedly, until the 1930s. And so, by the late 1950s, conditions were ripe for revolution.

But if other Latin American countries had grievances against the United States, what was it about Cuba that allowed a decades-long communist dictatorship to take root there? "It's Fidelismo," said Marquez. "It's a cult of personality. If it had been anybody else, this would've fizzled out within the first couple of years."

Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. / Credit: CBS News

The lateFidel Castrocame to power in 1959, and became a central actor in the Cold War, sparking fears of Communism spreading in the Americas. His authoritarian regime has surviveda decades-long trade embargo…a missile crisisthat brought the world to the brink of nuclear war … andthe collapse of the Soviet Union, Cuba's longtime patron.

Marquez still remembers the hold Castro had over a five-year-old growing up in Cuba: "I was, like, in first grade or just starting first grade. And they have something called the Pioneers for the Revolution – you wear a red scarf. And they would ask, 'Bow your heads and pray to God for candy.' And the children would bow their heads and pray to God for candy … and open your eyes."

After no candy appeared, the children would be told, "'Bow your heads, close your eyes, and ask Fidel for candy.' … I wish I were making this up! And lo and behold, there will be the candy."

Marquez and his family fled Cuba in 1967, among the more than 1.5 million who have left the island for the U.S. since the early 1960s.

Elsa and Becky Cobo's late father, Arturo, was a teenager in Havana in 1960 when he witnessed his own father's bank being seized by the regime. "He saw the military come and take basically the keys from my grandfather and tell him, 'Go,' and that's when he said, 'We gotta do something,'" said Elsa.

Advertisement

A group of U.S.-backed Cuban exiles who attempted an invasion at the Bay of Pigs are seen after being captured by Castro's soldiers, on the Playa de Giron, Cuba, April 1961. / Credit: Three Lions/Getty Images

Arturo escaped to the U.S., and enlisted in the CIA-trained brigade of Cuban exiles who, in April 1961, landed at Cuba's Bay of Pigs in a secret operation meant to overthrow the Castro regime. The soldiers were expecting air cover from the Americans. At the last minute, though, Democratic President John F. Kennedy pulled the plug – a turn of events Cuban-Americans never forgot.

"They were basically left there to die," said Elsa.

Asked why so many Cuban-Americans are so staunchly Republican, Marquez replied, "Bay of Pigs. That's it. You don't have to go further than that."

How Fidel Castro stood up to the U.S., and won("Sunday Morning")

Arturo Cobo spent nearly two years in a Cuban prison. When he was released, he settled in Key West, Fla., where his daughters still live today.

There, Arturo helped wave after wave of refugees arriving from his home country. Many didn't survive the voyage.

At the Key West Botanical Garden, you can see evidence of their desperation – makeshift rafts used by Cubans to reach America, some made of Styrofoam.

Some examples of makeshift Cuban refugee boats, or

Arturo Cobo died in 2019. He, like so many others who fled Castro's Cuba, never returned. "They came over hoping that one day Cuba would be free," said Becky, "and never imagined … they would not see the day that that would happen."

As Trump continues to strike a deal with Cuba, exiles in South Florida hope to recuperate seized property

Jorge Malagon Marquez says those waves of migration have remade South Florida. But their absence in Cuba may also help explain the regime's longevity: "Those that would have been willing to rise up? Gone. I mean, you gotta give it to Fidel Castro. He was brilliant, you know, in a sort of, like, evil way. He was the evil genius."

ButCastro died in 2016, and the Cold War is long over. Few believe Cuba poses the threat that it once did to the U.S. The Cuban economy, never robust under communist rule, has been in freefall since the pandemic, with nearly a fifth of the population leaving since 2021.

A deepening energy and economic crisis, fueled in part by economic sanctions by the United States, has left Cuba dependent on foreign assistance and oil shipments from allied countries, including Mexico and Russia.  / Credit: CBS News

And now the Trump administration is turning the screws on an already-failing state, worsening its humanitarian crisis. Mr. Trump said of Cuba, "Whether I free it, take it, I think I can do anything I want with it."

Cubans on both sides of the Florida Straits are pondering what comes next.

For more info:

Miami Dade CollegeThe Freedom Tower (MDC)Key West Tropical Forest & Botanical Garden, Key West, Fla.

Story produced by Mark Hudspeth. Editor: Emanuele Secci.

Cuban cigarmakers look to light up U.S. market("Sunday Morning")Drawing a curtain on the U.S.-Cuban Cold War("Sunday Morning")"Buena Vista Social Club" serenades Broadway("Sunday Morning")The story of modern Cuba("Sunday Morning")

The long history of America's conflict with Cuba

Next: Cuba? 08:20 With so much attention onIranin recent weeks, you may have missed the news about the increasingly tense situati...
Why a century-old naval disaster means Trump can’t take the Strait of Hormuz by force

Why hasnothing been doneto reopen theStrait of Hormuz?

The Independent US

The answer is simple – as his advisers will have toldDonald Trumpbefore he attackedIran, it is almost impossible toclear a passagethrough a minefield when the shoreline is held by the enemy, without being prepared to take significant casualties. And this, it seems, the US is not prepared to do.

It is one thing to bomb a less technologically sophisticated enemy from the air, but quite another to get involved in a real fight at sea level with an opponent who has been planning this form of asymmetric warfarefor a very long time.

Historygives a stark lesson on why America needs to tread warily – a page from theFirst World War.

It was March 1915. The “straits” concerned were the Dardanelles – the narrow passage linking the Mediterranean to the Black Sea and giving access to Istanbul. The Turks were the defenders, the British and the French the attackers.

They were in the middle of a shooting war. A vital waterway, which would normally be open for the world’s commerce, was closed because of the actions of Turkey, the bordering power. The coastline was heavily defended, and there was a high probability that mines had been laid to block the channel.

HMS Irresistible, abandoned in the Dardanelles, in northern Turkey, on 18 March 1915. She hit two mines, the second of which destroyed her main engines, and 600 men had to be rescued (Library of Congress/Royal Navy)

A decision was made by the British and French that the straits were to be reopened by force – and a very considerable force was assembled for that purpose.

It comprised no fewer than 14 “capital” ships (in those days “battleships” and “battlecruisers”) supported by escorts and a large force of minesweepers.

The plan was a good one. The capital ships would stand off in clear water and bombard the shore defences. When these had been silenced, the minesweepers would go ahead and sweep another clear area.

The capital ships would then move forward again into swept water and recommence their bombardment – successive waves of big ships moving up, but always into water which had been swept for mines. In this way, the whole channel would be cleared, and the straits reopened.

The big push commenced on 18 March 1915. To start with, it all went well. Four capital ships – HM shipsQueen Elizabeth,Agamemnon,Lord NelsonandInflexible– formed the first attacking line.

The second line was composed of four French ships,Gaulois,Charlemagne,BouvetandSuffren. They, in turn, were to be supported by six more British ships – HM shipsOcean,Irresistible,Albion,Vengeance,SwiftsureandMajestic– which would form a third line to pass through and relieve the French in line two.

The bombardment was started by the RN ships in line one at 11am. By 12.20pm, the French ships of line two had steamed through the first line to take up their advanced positions.

Advertisement

By 1.45pm, the fire from the shore batteries had slackened under the onslaught of the guns of the eight capital ships, and it was deemed safe enough to send in the minesweepers for the next phase. The third line of six ships was also called up to move the force forward.

However, 15 minutes later, everything started to go wrong. FSBouvethit a mine, and in a matter of minutes, she capsized and sank. There were only 75 survivors out of a ship’s company of 718.

The action continued. HMSIrresistibleof the third wave was bombarding the forts when she, in turn, struck a mine at 3.14pm. She developed a severe list but continued with the action until she hit another mine, and her main engines were put out of action completely.

An attempt was made to take her in tow, but the situation was hopeless, and the order was given to abandon ship. More than 600 men were taken to safety.

Meanwhile, shortly after 4pm, HMSInflexiblestruck a mine. She remained capable of steaming slowly and was ordered to withdraw. However, she had a 30ft x 26ft hole below the waterline and had to be beached to save her from sinking. She was later towed to Malta for repairs and was out of action for three months.

A Royal Navy cruiser painted in dazzle camouflage in the Dardanelles, 1915 (Getty)

After these disasters, Vice-Admiral John de Robeck, the British admiral in charge of the Allied naval forces during the crucial stages of the campaign, finally decided that the waters which had been considered to be safe and swept of mines were anything but.

Accordingly, at 5.50pm, less than seven hours into the operation, he signalled a “General Recall” to withdraw the ships and return to the safe waters outside the straits.

Fifteen minutes later, at 6.05pm, HMSOceanstruck another mine, developed a major list and was deemed not to be capable of being saved. The ship’s company were taken off and she was left to her fate. BothIrresistibleandOceanlater sank.

Fourteen major warships had attempted to force the straits. Within four hours, three of them had been sunk and one had been so badly damaged that she was out of action.

This one day of disaster was the end of trying to take the Dardanelles passage by solely naval means. The attempt was never repeated.

USS Abraham Lincoln conducts US blockade operations related to the Strait of Hormuz on 16 April 2026, in the Arabian Sea (US Navy)

From that day on, the focus shifted to “boots on the ground” to conquer the Turks on land – but as is well known, this likewise failed.

A relatively weak opponent had defeated the combined forces of the two largest navies in the world by its use of asymmetric warfare and, most importantly, by the deployment of mines.

A lesson for our times, Mr President.

John Clark is a former Royal Naval Reserve officer who commanded various minesweepers and minehunters during his service

Why a century-old naval disaster means Trump can’t take the Strait of Hormuz by force

Why hasnothing been doneto reopen theStrait of Hormuz? The answer is simple – as his advisers will have toldDonald Trumpbefore he ...
Trump says shooting suspect didn't come close to ballroom

WASHINGTON, April 26 (Reuters) - President ‌Donald Trump ‌said in an ​interview on Sunday on Fox News' "The Sunday ‌Briefing" ⁠that the suspected shooter ⁠at the White ​House ​Correspondents' ​Dinner was ‌stopped by law enforcement and didn't come close to ‌entering the ​ballroom ​where ​the ‌event was taking ​place.

Reuters

Advertisement

(Reporting ​by Katharine Jackson and ​Ryan ‌Patrick Jones; ​Editing by Caitlin ​Webber)

Trump says shooting suspect didn't come close to ballroom

WASHINGTON, April 26 (Reuters) - President ‌Donald Trump ‌said in an ​interview on Sunday on Fox News' "The Sunday ‌Briefing...

 

NEO JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com