Destruction of vital US radar aircraft could hamper ability to spot Iran threats, analysts say

The destruction of a US Air Force E-3 Sentry aircraft in an Iranian strike on a Saudi Arabia air base could damage US abilities to spot incoming Iranian threats at distance, analysts say.

CNN The wreckage of a US Air Force E-3 Sentry airborne warning and control aircraft sits on the tarmac at an air base in Saudi Arabia. - Air Force amn/nco/snco/Facebook

Dramatic images of the wrecked aircraft, geolocated by CNN, show its tail broken off and its distinct rotating radar dome –– a critical part of the airborne warning and control system, or AWACS –– on the ground at the Prince Sultan Air Base.

The loss of the AWACS is "a serious blow to (US) surveillance capabilities," said CNN military analyst Cedric Leighton, a former US Air Force colonel who has flown on the aircraft.

"It can potentially impact (US) ability to control combat aircraft and vector them to their targets or protect them from engagements of hostile aircraft and missile systems," he said.

CNN has reached out to US Central Command for comment on the destruction of the aircraft.

The AWACS enables airborne monitoring of up to 120,000 square miles of battlespace from the ground to the stratosphere, and it has been a vital component of US fighting forces for decades. The fleet of 17 E-3s, and America's experience using them over the years, is seen by analysts as a major advantage enjoyed by Washington.

Images of the destroyed aircraft began appearing on social media sites over the weekend. CNN geolocated the images to the air base in central Saudi Arabia by comparing them to a satellite image from March 11, which showed the E-3 aircraft at the same location in the recent photos.

A US Air Force E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System plane is seen at Prince Sultan Air Base on March 11, 2026. - Airbus

CNN had previously reported that an attack on the air base left at least 10 US service members injured. No fatalities were reported. A US Air Force tanker aircraft was also damaged, sources said.

The E-3 aircraft itself is a powerful airborne command post as well as a surveillance platform.

It can track around 600 targets at one time, from other aircraft, to missiles, to large drones, even down to tanks on the battlefield.

Personnel aboard the E-3 can pass that info down to commanders in theater, to ships at sea or back to the Pentagon in real time.

Meanwhile, controllers aboard the AWACS can direct interceptor fighter jets to incoming threats or send attack aircraft to support ground troops under fire.

A report this month from the Center for a New American Security calls the AWACS the "quarterback" of the battlefield, "nimbly providing critical situational awareness and real-time coordination that turns individual sorties into a dominant force."

The report calls AWACS "an indispensable asset for US military operations today and for the foreseeable future."

Peter Layton, a former Royal Australian Air Force officer and fellow at the Griffith Asia Institute, said airborne radars exponentially increase the detection time of threats.

In the current conflict, an E-3 might see an incoming Iranian Shahed drone launched 200 miles away about 85 minutes sooner than ground-based radar, Layton said.

Because they are mobile, the AWACS can move quickly to new crisis areas and present are a harder target for adversaries than fixed ground-based radars.

Advertisement

Surprise aircraft was left vulnerable

Analysts on Monday questioned how the US allowed the E-3 to become vulnerable to Iranian attack.

"Extraordinary measures are often taken to protect it from hostile enemy fire while in-flight. Sometimes it receives fighter escorts and is never allowed to overfly hostile territory in order to keep it safe," said Leighton.

He called the loss of the E-3 on the ground "a serious breach of our Force Protection efforts."

Leighton also said the attack may indicate Iran is getting help in targeting key US assets.

"Russia most likely gave Iran geographic coordinates and satellite imagery that provided the precise location," he said.

The attack shows how Iran is being selective in going after limited high-value targets with the forces it has, Kelly Grieco, a fellow at the Stimson Center, wrote on X.

She pointed to attacks at radar and satellite communications infrastructure on other US bases across the region since the war began.

"Iran's going after the radars that detect threats, the tankers that keep jets flying, and the AWACS that direct the battle. That's a counter-air campaign. Adapted to what Iran can actually do. And the damage is real," Grieco wrote.

An aging asset

Analysts also noted the size and age of the US E-3 fleet and the strain that Middle East operations are putting on it.

The E-3 is in limited supply in the US fleet, only 17 on hand at the beginning of the year, according to FlightGlobal.com's 2026 World Air Forces directory. That's fewer AWACS than B-2 bombers (20).

And they are old. The first aircraft joined the Air Force fleet in 1978, and the US fleet has shrunk from 32 aircraft in 2015.

The four-engine jets, based on the Boeing 707 commercial airframe carry a flight crew of four, plus 13 to 19 mission specialists, a number that can fluctuate depending on the specific assignment involved, according to the Air Force.

The planes cost around $270 million in fiscal 1998 dollars, according to the Air Force, around $540 million today.

Besides the US, Saudi Arabia, France and Chile operate the E-3, and NATO has its own joint force of 14.

The US Air Force has been looking at replacements for the aging fleet, but the Pentagon has yet to settle on a platform although some prototypes are in development.

The US Navy operates a similar but much smaller airborne warning and control aircraft, the E-2 Hawkeye, which can fly off aircraft carriers and are used to monitor the battlespace of carrier strike groups.

But the Hawkeye is not an easy replacement for the Sentry. Because it's smaller, the Hawkeye has fewer crew to monitor the battlespace, and as it is a turboprop, rather than a jet, it can't get as high as the Sentry, meaning its radar can't cover as much territory.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Destruction of vital US radar aircraft could hamper ability to spot Iran threats, analysts say

The destruction of a US Air Force E-3 Sentry aircraft in an Iranian strike on a Saudi Arabia air base could damage US abi...
Rio Tinto resumes operations at three Pilbara port terminals after cyclone Narelle

March 30 (Reuters) - Rio Tinto said on Monday operations at three of its four Pilbara ‌iron ore port terminals have resumed after ‌Tropical Cyclone Narelle swept through Western Australia's Pilbara region, disrupting shipments ​but leaving its annual guidance unchanged.

Reuters

Cyclone Narelle brought heavy rain and power outages to Australia's northeast coast earlier this month, forcing the miner to temporarily shut ‌two bauxite mines. ⁠South32 also suspended operations at its Gemco manganese mine, co-owned by Anglo American.

Narelle barrelled ⁠into Australia's northwest coast last week, causing port closures in its iron-rich Pilbara region.

Rio, the world's largest ​iron ore ​producer, said ship loading ​at three terminals resumed ‌on March 28 following port closures on March 24.

Advertisement

Shipping at Cape Lambert A, the fourth terminal currently undergoing repairs, is expected to recommence "in the coming days", the miner said.

Two tropical cyclones in February and ‌March are estimated to have ​affected iron ore shipments for ​the firm by ​around eight million metric tons, Rio ‌said, adding that it has "identified ​a pathway to ​recover around half of these losses."

Rio's guidance for its Pilbara iron ore shipments for 2026 ​remained unchanged at ‌323 million tons to 338 million tons.

(Reporting ​by Shivangi Lahiri in Bengaluru; Editing by Mrigank ​Dhaniwala and Janane Venkatraman)

Rio Tinto resumes operations at three Pilbara port terminals after cyclone Narelle

March 30 (Reuters) - Rio Tinto said on Monday operations at three of its four Pilbara ‌iron ore port terminals have resum...
Trump wants to define who is an American. Will Supreme Court let him?

WASHINGTON − Who is an American?

USA TODAY

That's the fundamental question theSupreme Courtwill take up on April 1 when it debates PresidentDonald Trump'sability to sharply restrictwhich children born in the United States are automatically citizens.

The court's ruling is likely to land shortly before the nation celebrates its 250thanniversary, adding to the significance of a case that was already a blockbuster.

It'sanother opportunityfor theSupreme Courtto weigh in on the expansive authority Trump has claimed since returning to the White House last year.

Can he change the definition ofbirthright citizenshipwith a stroke of his pen? "What the president's executive order attempts to do is to rewrite citizenship as we have known it since the late 19thcentury," said César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, an expert on immigration law at Ohio State University College of Law.

More:Will the majority-Catholic Supreme Court listen to the church on immigration?

Olga Urbina and her child Ares Webster from Baltimore, MD, demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. People protest outside the Supreme Court on May 15, 2025, as justices hear oral arguments over President Donald Trump's bid to broadly enforce his executive order to restrict automatic birthright citizenship. Demonstrators rally on the day the Supreme Court justices hear oral arguments over President Donald Trump's bid to broadly enforce his executive order to restrict automatic birthright citizenship, during a protest outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., May 15, 2025. People outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. Demonstrators rally on the day the Supreme Court justices hear oral arguments over President Donald Trump's bid to broadly enforce his executive order to restrict automatic birthright citizenship, during a protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.,May 15, 2025. People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. People outside the U.S. Supreme Court protest President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship as the court hears arguments over the order on May 15, 2025. People participate in a protest outside the Supreme Court over President Donald Trump's move to end birthright citizenship as the court hears arguments over the order in Washington, DC, on May 15, 2025. Trump issued an executive order on his first day in office seeking to limit birthright citizenship for children whose parents are in the United States illegally or on temporary visas, but it has been blocked in multiple appellate courts. He appealed the case to the Supreme Court on March 13. A person demonstrates outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship. People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship.

See people outside Supreme Court demonstrate for birthright citizenship in May 2025

What does the Constitution say about birthright citizenship?

The 14thAmendment, ratified in 1868, says: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

That's long been interpreted to include everyone except children born to diplomats, to invading military forces and – initially – to Native Americans, who later got birthright citizenship under a 1924 law.

In alandmark rulingin 1898, the Supreme Court upheld the citizenship of a San Francisco-born man – Wong Kim Ark − whose Chinese parents were barred from becoming citizens under the laws of the time.

And immigration laws enacted in the mid-20thcentury used nearly identical language as the 14thAmendment.

But Trump says that language has been misread.

He argues that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" rules out children born to parents who aren't citizens, because they may feel loyal to a foreign country even if they have to follow U.S. laws while they're here. The Supreme Court's 1898 decision, the Justice Department says, applied to children whose parents had a "permanent domicile and residence in the United States."

Go deeper:President Trump's winning streak at the Supreme Court is about to get tested

President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference at the White House, on June 27, 2025, following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on whether judges could block Trump's changes to birthright citizenship.

What is Trump's policy?

On his first day back in office, Trumpdirectedfederal agencies not to recognize the citizenship of babies born in the United States who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder.

Thatexecutive order– titled "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship" – is one of more than 500policy changesfrom the administration that longtime immigration law scholar Stephen Yale-Loehr said are among the most sweeping immigration restrictions in modern U.S. history.

Yale-Loehr, a retired Cornell Law School professor, said the policies are "both a different magnitude and different quality" than what Trump pushed in his first administration.

But while presidents have a lot of latitude over who is allowed into the United States, defining who is an American by birth is different.

"Historically, all Supreme Courts have been deferential to presidents on immigration because immigration touches on sovereignty and foreign affairs," he said. "This involves a clause in the Constitution itself."

More:Countries in the Americas grant birthright citizenship. What happens if they revoke it?

People demonstrated May 15, 2025 outside the Supreme Court before justices heard oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc., a birthright citizenship case.

Round two at the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court took up Trump's birthright citizenship executive order last year, but only to decide whether lower courts had gone too far in blocking its implementation while the order is being challenged.

In a6-3 decisionin June, the court rejected the way judges had put Trump's order on ice but left open another path.

And it wasn't long before that path was used.

In July, a federal judge in New Hampshireblockedthe citizenship order in a class-action lawsuit brought by affected children and their parents.

Judge Joseph Laplante said the order likely contradicts the 14thAmendment "and the century-old untouched precedent that interprets it." He also said it probably violates a federal law that includes similar language.

More:Springsteen's 'Born in the U.S.A.' joins Trump citizenship court fight

Who is challenging Trump's policy?

The parents representing their children in the lawsuit include a woman from Honduras who has lived in the United States since 2024 and gave birth months after Trump signed his executive order.

Advertisement

Identified by the pseudonym "Barbara," the woman said in court filings she's seeking asylum from gang activity in Honduras, and her family has become part of the local community in New Hampshire.

Another mother challenging the order came to the United States from Taiwan in 2013 on a student visa and is applying for a work visa. She and her husband have four children, three born in the United States before Trump's executive order and one born after.

"My husband and I ended up building a life here," the woman, known as "Susan," said in a court filing. "My baby has the right to citizenship and a future in the United States."

Barbara, a 35-year old pregnant asylum-seeker from Cuba, poses for a portrait in Louisville, Kentucky, U.S., May 9, 2025.

More:Trump ramps up attack on birthright citizenship case in Supreme Court

'Foundational to who we are as a nation'

The American Civil Liberties Union, which is representing the immigrants, is arguing to the Supreme Court that birthright citizenship "is foundational to who we are as a nation."

"This case is about the administration's effort to redefine what America is," said Cody Wofsy, a lawyer with the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project. "Going all the way back to the country's founding, the rule had been that if you're born in this country, you're an American."

The 14th Amendment's citizenship clause was passed after the Civil War to repudiate the Supreme Court's infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision that a Black person was not a citizen of the U.S. But the clause covers "all persons."

Under Trump's policy, roughly 255,000 children born on U.S. soil each year would start life without U.S. citizenship,accordingto the Migration Policy Institute.

Trump, and those backing his executive order, argue he's trying to protect American citizenship from being devalued.

"This debate is not just about immigration policy; it's about the meaning of American citizenship," Sen. Eric Schmitt, a Republican from Missouri, said during a recentSenate hearingon the issue. "If citizenship loses its meaning, the foundations of the republic begin to weaken from within."

More:What history reveals about Trump's move to limit birthright citizenship

Sen. Eric Schmitt R-Mo., delivers remarks during a Senate Armed Services committee hearing on the expected nomination of Pete Hegseth to be Secretary of Defense on Jan. 14, 2025.

What defines citizenship?

Schmitt said citizenship needs to be rooted in allegiance to the national community and shouldn't apply to the children of people who are in the country as students, tourists or without the government's permission.

But Alejandro Barranco, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran whose father was violently arrested by immigration agents last year because he was living in the United States without legal status, said he's proof that belonging to a nation is defined by someone's contribution − not their ancestry.

"I was born here. I grew up here. I served here," Barranco told the Senate Judiciary Committee. "I love this country, and I have shown that through my actions."

Alejandro Barranco testifies during a hearing before the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee at the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 12, 2026. The committee held a hearing on

While a 2025Pew Research Center pollfound near unanimous agreement that people born in the country to U.S.-born parents or to parents who immigrated legally should be citizens, the public was evenly divided over birthright citizenship for people whose parents immigrated illegally.

Half of adults surveyed said those babies should have citizenship and 49% disagreed.

More:USA Happy Baby, birth tourism and a blockbuster Supreme Court case

How might the Supreme Court rule?

One reason the Supreme Court often agrees to take a case is because lower courts have split over the issue.

Because none of the multiple judges who have reviewed Trump's policy have found it lawful, the easier route for the Supreme Court would have been to reject the administration's appeal, said García Hernández, the immigration law expert at Ohio State University College of Law.

"But that's not what they have done," he said. "That suggests that there are some justices who are inclined to agree with the president."

People demonstrated outside the Supreme Court before justices heard oral arguments on whether the court should reverse lower courts' efforts to block President Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship.

The most important case of the century?

The justices, however, may also have taken the case, Trump v. Barbara, to give a definitive answer.

Eric Wessan, an attorney with the Iowa Attorney General's office − which joined a legal brief written by GOP attorneys general backing Trump − said it's possible the court will choose a narrower route.

Rather than ruling on the original meaning of the 14thAmendment, he said, the justices could simply say that an executive order can't override the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, which uses similar language that was well understood at the time.

"That's kind of what I would call a Chief Justice (John) Roberts special, where he can avoid a really difficult constitutional holding while at the same time reaffirming the supremacy of Congress," Wessan said during awebinarpreviewing the arguments.

In a filing to the Supreme Court, prominent constitutional law scholar Akhil Reed Amar urged the justices not to avoid addressing the constitutional question by focusing solely on the Immigration and Nationality Act. He said the case could be the most important of the century.

"All constitutional issues are important," Amar wrote, "but few rival the constitutional issues in this case: Who is an American? May a president ignore the Constitution itself? May a president defy valid congressional statutes and make himself a dictator of all law?"

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Supreme Court to decide if Trump can redefine birthright citizenship

Trump wants to define who is an American. Will Supreme Court let him?

WASHINGTON − Who is an American? That's the fundamental question theSupreme Courtwill take up on April 1 w...
Hall of Fame Award of Character: Detroit educator Dr. Isaiah 'Ike' McKinnon turns pain into purpose

Courage. Integrity. Commitment. Honesty. Respect.

USA TODAY Sports

Those are the values enshrined in Canton. But you don't need a gold jacket to live them.

Through its Award of Character, the Pro Football Hall of Fame, in partnership with USA TODAY, honors teachers, nurses, coaches, firefighters, police officers and veterans whose impact on their communities rivals that of the game's greatest legends.

This month's honoree is Dr. Isaiah "Ike" McKinnon, a Michigan instructor whose life of service spans nearly five decades — and whose journey transformed personal trauma into a lifelong mission of fairness, justice and healing in Detroit.

A surprise visit and a lifetime of recognition

"What the heck?"

That was Dr. McKinnon's first reaction when Hall of Fame representatives arrived at his home.

Waiting for him were Jarrett Payton, son of Hall of Famer Walter Payton, and Hall of Fame linebacker Dave Robinson, there to deliver an unexpected honor.

"We are here on behalf of the Pro Football Hall of Fame," Payton told him. "To present you with the Pro Football Hall of Fame Award of Character, in partnership with USA TODAY."

The moment was overwhelming.

"Oh my God," McKinnon said repeatedly, visibly stunned. "You're going to give me a heart attack."

Robinson handed him the award — heavy in both weight and meaning — a symbol of values McKinnon has lived by for most of his life.

Dr. Isaiah 'Ike' McKinnon, right, responds as Jarrett Payton informs McKinnon that he's being honored with the Pro Football Hall of Fame Award of Character for his work in the Detroit community.

From injustice to intention

McKinnon's path to service was forged in pain.

At just 14 years old, he was beaten by Detroit police officers in 1957. The experience could have driven him away from the profession forever. Instead, it pushed him toward it.

"I made myself a promise that night," he said. "I was going to become a police officer — because I saw things that shouldn't happen to anybody."

Years later, during the 1967 Detroit uprising, that promise was tested again. While driving home in uniform, McKinnon was pulled over by fellow officers, guns drawn, who threatened his life.

"There was never an investigation," he said. "Nothing was ever done."

Still, he stayed.

Older officers, Black and white, encouraged him not to quit. And he listened.

Advertisement

"There was no way I was going to leave," McKinnon said.

Detroit Police Department Executive Lt. Isaiah McKinnon at work at his desk on September 20, 1978.

Earning trust, one person at a time

McKinnon devoted his life to Detroit, first as a police officer, later as chief, deputy mayor, professor and coach.

He earned degrees while working full time, eventually becoming a respected educator and mentor. He worked long hours, often 14 to 16 hours a day, determined to rebuild trust between police and the communities they served.

One moment, early in his career, stayed with him forever.

After chasing a suspect into a building, McKinnon found himself facing armed men with assault rifles. As tensions escalated, members of the surrounding community intervened.

"Let Officer Ike go," they said. "He treats us fairly."

The armed men backed away.

"That reaffirmed everything I believed," McKinnon said. "Being a good person matters."

A legacy beyond titles

McKinnon could have chosen bitterness. Few would have blamed him.

Instead, he chose grace.

"He fought against all the odds to make the world better, not just for himself, but for everyone," one colleague said. "That's an incredible leap of human dignity."

Even now, years after leaving office, McKinnon is recognized throughout Detroit. Former students, young officers and community members still stop him to say thank you.

"That's a good feeling," he said. "Detroit is a big, small town."

Former Detroit Police Chief Isaiah McKinnon speaks during 12th Precinct community event in 1995.

Words for the next generation

As Hall of Fame players do when they're enshrined, McKinnon was asked to offer advice that might live on.

His message was simple and unwavering.

"You have to stand up for what's right," he said. "And stand against what's wrong. If you don't, who's going to make that difference?"

It's a philosophy that carried him through hardship, leadership and decades of service, and one that now earns him a permanent place among the Hall of Fame's Awards of Character honorees.

This article was created in partnership with the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Dr. Ike McKinnon honored with Hall of Fame character award

Hall of Fame Award of Character: Detroit educator Dr. Isaiah ‘Ike’ McKinnon turns pain into purpose

Courage. Integrity. Commitment. Honesty. Respect. Those are the values enshrined in Canton. But you don't n...
Jokic has 25 points, 15 rebounds, Nuggets beat Warriors 116-93 for their 6th straight win

DENVER (AP) — Nikola Jokic had 25 points and 15 rebounds, Jamal Murray had 20 points, and the surging Denver Nuggets beat the short-handed Golden State Warriors 116-93 on Sunday night.

Associated Press Denver Nuggets center Nikola Jokić thorws the ball in an attempt to make a basket as time runs out in the first quarter of an NBA basketball game against the Golden State Warriors Sunday, March 29, 2026, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) Golden State Warriors forward Kristaps Porziņģis, left, fields a pass as Denver Nuggets forward Cameron Johnson defends in the first half of an NBA basketball game Sunday, March 29, 2026, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) Golden State Warriors guard Pat Spencer, right, drives past Denver Nuggets guard Tim Hardaway Jr. in the first half of an NBA basketball game Sunday, March 29, 2026, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) Denver Nuggets guard Tim Hardaway Jr., left, exchanges words with Golden State Warriors forward Draymond Green in the first half of an NBA basketball game Sunday, March 29, 2026, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) Golden State Warriors forward Kristaps Porziņģis, left, drives past Denver Nuggets forward Spencer Jones in the first half of an NBA basketball game Sunday, March 29, 2026, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

Warriors Nuggets Basketball

Jokic finished two assists shy of his fifth straight triple-double but led Denver to its sixth consecutive win. The Nuggets (48-28) are two games ahead of Minnesota and Houston for fourth in the Western Conference.

Brandin Podziemski and Kristaps Porzingis scored 23 apiece for Golden State, which continued to be without Stephen Curry.

Curry missed his 25th game in a row with a balky right knee. The Warriors (36-39) have lost 16 of the 25 games with Curry sidelined.

Denver forward Aaron Gordon was out after experiencing calf soreness when he woke up Sunday morning. Gordon has missed 44 games this season with separate hamstring injuries.

The Nuggets then lost Spencer Jones to hamstring tightness in the first half and Cameron Johnson went to the locker room early in the third quarter holding his left ribs.

Johnson returned to the bench with his torso wrapped. Neither played again.

Advertisement

Things became chippy in the second quarter when Denver backup center Zeke Nnaji, pressed into action due to the injuries, got into an altercation with De'Anthony Melton and Gary Payton II after Murray and LJ Cryer exchanged shoves.

Late in the period Payton was hit with a Flagrant 1 for a hard foul on Peyton Watson.

Golden State went on a 19-2 run in the second quarter to lead by 13 and it was 53-46 at halftime, but the Nuggets rallied. Tim Hardaway Jr. had 10 points in third when Denver outscored the Warriors 40-21.

Up next

Warriors: Host San Antonio on Tuesday night.

Nuggets: At Utah on Wednesday night.

AP NHL:https://apnews.com/hub/nhl

Jokic has 25 points, 15 rebounds, Nuggets beat Warriors 116-93 for their 6th straight win

DENVER (AP) — Nikola Jokic had 25 points and 15 rebounds, Jamal Murray had 20 points, and the surging Denver Nuggets beat...

 

NEO JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com