Analysis: Iran war becomes a contest of who can take the most pain

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Thewar on Iran, for all its complexity and global effects, boils down to a single question: Who can take the pain the longest?

Associated Press FILE - A plume of smoke rises after a strike in Tehran, Iran, Monday, March 2, 2026. (AP Photo/Mohsen Ganji, File) FILE - Policemen stand on top of their car with pictures of the late Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, right and left, and his son Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, the successor to him, center, during a rally to support him in Tehran, Iran, March 9, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File) FILE - Drivers navigate a busy intersection past a sign displaying the current gas prices at a filling station in Plano, Texas, March 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez, File) FILE - Plumes of smoke rise as strikes hit the city during the U.S.–Israeli military campaign in Tehran, Iran, March 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File) FILE - People gather in a rally to support Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, the successor to his late father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as supreme leader, in Tehran, Iran, March 9, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File)

Iran US Analysis

A surge in oil prices points to what may be Iran's most effective weapon and the United States' biggest vulnerability in continuing the campaign:Damaging the world economy. A sharp rise in gas prices hasrattled consumersand financial markets, and international travel and shipping have been severely disrupted.

U.S. President Donald Trump appears aware of the danger. As oil jumped to nearly $120 a barrel on Monday, the highest since 2022, he suggestedthe war would be "short-term."That helped reassure markets and the price eased to around $90 — even as Trump, nearly in the same breath, vowed to keep up the war and the punishment on Iran.

On the other side, Iran has to endure a near-constant stream of American and Israeli airstrikes it can't defend against. So far, the Islamic Republic has been able tokeep its leadershipand military cohesive and in control. The Iranian public, which already rose up against its theocracy in nationwide protests in January, stillboils in angerbut have stayed home as they try to survive the heavy bombardment. Security forces have been on the street every day to ensure no anti-government demonstrations form.

The pressure is on U.S. allies as well. Gulf Arab states, while still not combatants in the war, face seemingly unending and occasionally fatal Iranian fire targeting oil fields, cities and critical water works. And Israel, while boasting of inflicting heavy damage on Iran's missile program and other military targets, continues to be targeted by increasingly sophisticated Iranian missiles that send a buckshot-like bouquet of high explosives raining down on its cities. Frequent air-raid sirens have disrupted daily life, closed schools and workplaces and created a tense atmosphere across the region.

No off-ramps seen in fighting

There's no immediate end to the war in sight — nor in the rhetoric coming from both America and Iran, whose bad blood extends back decades to the 1979 Islamic Revolution and the U.S. Embassy hostage crisis.

"We've already won in many ways, but we haven't won enough," Trump said in a speech Monday in Doral, Florida. "We go forward, more determined than ever to achieve ultimate victory that will end this long running danger once and for all."

Iranian Foreign Ministry official Kazem Gharibabadi offered a mirror image comment from Tehran, boasting that the Islamic Republic had rejected contacts about a ceasefire that he said had come from China, France, Russia and others.

"At the moment, we hold the upper hand," Gharibabadi told Iranian state television late Monday night. "Just look at the state of the global economy and energy markets — it has been very painful for them."

He asserted that it was Iran that "will determine the end of the war."

Iranian strategy remains havoc

For years before Israel and the U.S. launched the war on Feb. 28, Iran warned that, if attacked, it would retaliate on the entire Middle East, targeting the oil infrastructure that made its Gulf Arab neighbors fantastically wealthy. By contrast, Tehran's economy has been crippled by international sanctions.

Iran has now backed up its threat with barrages of missiles and drones. Qatar was forced to halt its production of natural gas, and Bahrain declared its oil operations couldn't meet their contractual obligations. Other producers like Saudi Aramco are affected, disrupting a key source of energy for Asia — particularly China, which has sent a top envoy to the region.

Shipping broadly has stopped in the strategic Strait of Hormuz, the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf through which 20% of all oil and natural gas traded passes, and up to 30% of world fertilizer exports. Iran didn't need to mine the waterway — its attacks on several ships prompted companies stop sending their vessels through the strait.

Trump has suggested U.S. warships providing escorts to tankers, but that has yet to materialize in a way to restart the traffic.

Advertisement

Early Tuesday morning, he threatened that if Iran stops the oil through the strait, "they will be hit by the United States of America TWENTY TIMES HARDER than they have been hit thus far."

"Additionally, we will take out easily destroyable targets that will make it virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again — Death, Fire, and Fury will reign upon them — But I hope, and pray, that it does not happen!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform.

Iran, however, only doubled down. The Revolutionary Guard warned on Tuesday that it won't allow "a single liter of oil" to leave the Persian Gulf.

What is victory?

For Iran's theocratic rulers, victory means surviving the campaign still in power, no matter the costs to the country and the region.

Trump has been vague and contradictory about his aims in the war. At times, he seems to push for overthrowing Iran's theocracy; other times, he seems to be willing to stop short of that, saying broadly that he wants to ensure Iran is no longer a threat to Israel, the region and the U.S.

That could give him flexibility in declaring that victory has been achieved, especially if real damage starts to show to the U.S. economy.

But if the war stopped right now, both the U.S and Israel would be left with major challenges.

One is Iran's leadership. After an Israeli airstrike killed 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei at the start of the war, Iranian clerics named his 56-year-old son Mojtaba to the position, elevating him to the rank of an ayatollah.

Now Iran's ultimate ruler, the younger Khamenei has long been viewed by analysts as being even more hard-line than his father, with close ties to the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard. Israel already described him as a target in its campaign, while Trump has said he wanted someone else in the role.

Also, Iran still has its stockpile of highly enriched uranium – one reason for the war that Israel and the U.S. have both pointed to. Iran had been enriching up to 60% purity, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.

The U.S. bombed three Iranian nuclear sites in June during the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, likely burying much of the stockpile in the debris. Those sites to this day remain out of the reach of international inspectors.

Mojtaba Khamenei could issue a religious ruling, or fatwa, reversing his father's earlier statements and ordering it to be used to make a weapon. That's something both America and Israel, long believed to be the Mideast's only nuclear-armed state, don't want to see.

EDITOR'S NOTE —Jon Gambrell, news director for the Gulf and Iran for The Associated Press, has reported from each of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, Iran and other locations across the Mideast and the wider world since joining AP in 2006.

Analysis: Iran war becomes a contest of who can take the most pain

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Thewar on Iran, for all its complexity and global effects, boils down to a single ques...
Disappointing economic indicators spark stagflation worries | The Excerpt

On the Wednesday, March 11, 2026, episode of The Excerpt podcast:Alarm bells on the health of the U.S. economy are ringing. Could a recession be next? USA TODAY Money Reporter Andrea Riquier joins The Excerpt to share her latest insights as to where the economy is headed.

USA TODAY

Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it.This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.

Podcasts:True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here

Dana Taylor:

Alarm bells on the health of the US economy are ringing. An unexpectedly dismal jobs report, growing unemployment, and the ensuing uncertainty over trade policy piled on top of surging oil prices make the financial outlook particularly bleak this month. Could a recession be next?

Hello, and welcome to USA TODAY's The Excerpt. I'm Dana Taylor. Today is Wednesday, March 11th, 2026. Joining me to discuss recent economic indicators and what might lie ahead is USA TODAY Money Reporter Andrea Riquier. Andrea, thank you so much for joining me.

Andrea Riquier:

Hey, Dana. Thanks for having me.

Dana Taylor:

Andrea, you wrote that economists, analysts, and investors are concerned right now about the possibility of stagflation. What is stagflation and is this something we should be concerned about?

Andrea Riquier:

So stagflation refers to a really uncomfortable moment in the economy where economic growth is stagnant, it's not growing or even receding, and yet inflation is high. Typically, you see inflation higher when growth is strong, but this is uncomfortable because the policy responses are opposite for each one. When you have high inflation, you might want to raise interest rates to keep demand lower, and when you have slow growth, you might want to drop them in order to stimulate demand. So stagflation is a really difficult place for the economy and for the policymakers.

Dana Taylor:

A big concern with American consumers right now is the US-Israel war on Iran. Trump has waffled on his estimation of how long this conflict could last and how much it might cost Americans. Meanwhile, gas prices have been spiking across the country. What can you tell us here?

Andrea Riquier:

So I actually checked the nationwide gas prices just before we started recording. Across the nation, the average is $3.55. Obviously, there's huge local disparities, but it has been suggested that the $3.50 cent mark is roughly where things start to get a little uncomfortable for American consumers. If this is as high as we get and prices fall back from here, maybe it's not so difficult for most American consumers, most households. If it stays elevated like this, things could start to get very uncomfortable for people. The President has said that people should be okay with a little short-term discomfort in order to settle things for the long term, but American households are strapped for enough money to go around to buy everything that they need already. We'll just have to see where things go from here. There could be a quick resolution to this war, or it could drag on.

Dana Taylor:

Let's turn now to the latest jobs report, what does it say? And are you at all surprised?

Andrea Riquier:

It was a surprising jobs report. The labor department said that 92,000 jobs were lost in the month of February. They also downgraded the overall number for the full year, '25. And when you average out the 181,000 jobs that were created throughout 2025, that comes down to about 15,000 jobs a month, which is barely treading water. So take any one month with a grain of salt, but when you look at the longer trend over say 14 months, it does not look good.

Dana Taylor:

Andrea, help me put the latest unemployment numbers into perspective here. We saw robust hiring numbers in January, right?

Andrea Riquier:

Right. Again, take any one month with a grain of salt, but when you smooth it all out over a period of time, it looks like a slower growth, slowing economy.

Dana Taylor:

PresidentDonald Trump's signature economic policy centered on his trade policies involving tariffs. Those have recently been thrown out by the Supreme Court. He says that he has other ways to accomplish the same thing, but that it might take a little time to implement. How big of a role is that uncertainty playing here?

Andrea Riquier:

I think it's playing a big role. There's a lot of uncertainty around the tariffs that quite likely makes a lot of businesses a little bit more hesitant about committing to long-term plans like hiring, like capital expenditures, other than the AI infrastructure boom that we've talked about a lot, but it's certainly not helping on the margins. The Supreme Court decision on the tariffs is not the only big headwind out there in the economy. Obviously, the war is another one, and it's just a lot of uncertainty in a midterm election year as well for businesses to process, and it doesn't necessarily look like every business is going to go out and start shedding workers the way they did say in the COVID-19 pandemic, but it doesn't give a lot of comfort for wanting to commit to things long-term either.

Advertisement

Dana Taylor:

Economists with the Joint Economic Committee have put the cost of tariffs for the average American family at $1,700. Can Americans expect to see this money refunded at any point?

Andrea Riquier:

Yeah, that's the $1,700 question, right? I think we would all like to see some money back. I'm not sure that there's any way to know for sure. We know that a lot of companies have filed lawsuits about this. I think everybody would like a little bit of that money back, but I think that that could drag on for a while and I wouldn't bet on it, let's put it that way.

Dana Taylor:

What are we hearing from the Fed on the state of the economy? I believe their next meeting is next week.

Andrea Riquier:

That's right, the March meeting is next week. A lot of them have come out recently since the start of the Iran War and said exactly what we said at the top of the hour, this really complicates things. Again, a slow growth economy could be stimulated by rate cuts, but higher inflation, which to some extent they're a little more concerned about, would call for rate increases. Mary Daly of the San Francisco Fed said last Friday that a perfectly acceptable response to where we are right now is just to hold steady, to not do anything. And that's what most investors expect them to do for the foreseeable future.

Dana Taylor:

Andrea, we're also expecting to see a new Fed chair in May. That might change things, right? Tell me about that.

Andrea Riquier:

So first of all, Kevin Warsh still has to be confirmed and that process hasn't started yet, but yes, Donald Trump has nominated him with the belief that Kevin Warsh will be a little bit more amenable to cutting rates than Jay Powell has been. We know that Kevin Warsh, he has served on the Federal Reserve Board before, and we know that he has a pretty good understanding of the lay of the land. And I don't think anybody can expect any particular policymaker to move in one direction or another, given all the uncertainty, all the crosswinds that are going on right now. We'll just have to wait and see.

Dana Taylor:

I know consumer sentiment plays a big role in the economy. What's the news on that front?

Andrea Riquier:

We've talked a lot over the past say year or so about this K-shaped economy where higher income Americans are seeing their fortunes go up and moderate and lower income Americans are seeing things deteriorate. Consumer sentiment has really been in the toilet. There was a little bit of an improvement over the past couple readings, but not much. There's been this real discussion among economists and other analysts about whether Americans are just complaining because the health of the economy actually is pretty strong or what the disconnect is.

I think that seeing some of these official numbers start to reflect more what we're seeing in the sentiment numbers is pretty telling. Seeing, as we talked about earlier, a downgrade in the jobs picture from last year that helps explain some of the negative sentiment that we've been hearing about a lot. One person I talked to for this story about stagflation made the very, very prescient comment that we don't have to have an official diagnosis of stagflation for people to feel like we're really in a slow growth, high price environment, and that's just not fun for anybody.

Dana Taylor:

And finally, Andrea, how are you feeling about using the R word right now, are we teetering on the brink of a recession at this point, or is it too soon to tell?

Andrea Riquier:

I don't think it's too soon to tell. I think that teetering on the brink might be a little bit too dramatic, but I do think that there is reason to watch very closely. Some economists have increased the likelihood of a recession over the next say 12 months, but only to say 25% from 20%. Things would have to go pretty wrong for us to have sustained negative growth, but as we've talked about this entire session, there are a lot of headwinds in the economy right now.

Dana Taylor:

Andrea Riquier is a USA TODAY money reporter. Andrea, thank you so much for sharing your insights here.

Andrea Riquier:

Thanks, Dana. Take care.

Dana Taylor:

Thanks to our Senior Producer Kaely Monahan for her production assistance. Our executive producer is Laura Beatty. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending a note to podcasts@usatoday.com. Thanks for listening, I'm Dana Taylor, I'll be back tomorrow morning with another episode of USA TODAY's The Excerpt.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Low job numbers combined with high inflation sours economists' views | The Excerpt

Disappointing economic indicators spark stagflation worries | The Excerpt

On the Wednesday, March 11, 2026, episode of The Excerpt podcast:Alarm bells on the health of the U.S. economy are ringin...
A stunning U.S. loss to Italy leaves World Baseball Classic fate hanging

HOUSTON (AP) — The surprising loss by the United States to Italy in the World Baseball Classic Tuesday night means that the Americans need help to advance to the quarterfinals.

Associated Press United States right fielder Aaron Judge (99) lines out to center field in the sixth inning of a World Baseball Classic game against Italy , Tuesday, March 10, 2026, in Houston. (AP Photo/Ashley Landis) United States pitcher Brad Keller (40) walks to the dugout in the middle of the sixth inning of a World Baseball Classic game against Italy , Tuesday, March 10, 2026, in Houston. (AP Photo/Ashley Landis)

WBC Italy United States Baseball

The 8-6 defeatleft the team with a 3-1 record at the end of its pool schedule. Mexico and Italy wrap up Pool B play Wednesday night where a win by the Italians will give the U.S. second place and a spot in the next round.

If Mexico wins then all three teams will move to 3-1 and 1-1 against each other and send it to a tiebreaker.

The tiebreaker is the number of runs allowed in games between the tied teams. So, the U.S. could also advance even if Mexico wins if it scores at least five runs.

Aaron Judge, who struck out in the ninth to end it Tuesday night, is disappointed that the team failed to take care of business against Italy.

"It's the toughest thing," he said. "You always like having your destiny in your own hands and we had it right in front of us and Italy came out swinging."

The Italians hit three home runs in the first four innings to build a five-run lead and were up 8-0 before the U.S. got on the board.

After the game U.S. manager Mark DeRosa fielded questions about whether he thought his team had already secured a spot in the quarterfinals with Monday night's win over Mexico because of his comments on a television appearance Tuesday morning.

Advertisement

In that interview he said: "Ton of respect for Italy — it's weird — we want to win this game even though our ticket's punched to the quarterfinals because Mexico plays Italy actually tomorrow. So, the way the schedule lines up this is an important game for us."

In the interview room he said he "misspoke" in that segment and in a later interview outside the clubhouse he reiterated that he did not think they had already clinched a spot.

"One hundred percent… I misspoke," he said. "Bottom line."

Judge said the players didn't think that they had already secured a spot in the quarterfinals and that he didn't know about DeRosa's television interview.

Judge added that the team will probably gather at the hotel to watch Wednesday's game.

"It's out of our control now," he said. "We just need a little luck and we'll see what happens."

AP MLB:https://apnews.com/hub/mlb

A stunning U.S. loss to Italy leaves World Baseball Classic fate hanging

HOUSTON (AP) — The surprising loss by the United States to Italy in the World Baseball Classic Tuesday night means that t...
USMNT chooses Irvine, Calif., for World Cup base

The U.S. men's national team will set up its World Cup training base at Great Park Sports Complex in Irvine, Calif., this summer.

Field Level Media

The U.S. Soccer Federation announced the decision on Tuesday.

The Irvine location is less than 50 miles from SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, Calif., where the USMNT will play two of its three group-stage matches. The other match will be played in Seattle.

Should the U.S. win the group, its first knockout-stage match would be played at Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, Calif.

Great Park features 24 soccer fields, including a 5,000-plus-seat stadium that is the home of Orange County SC, a soccer team in the USL Championship. The USMNT will train at the stadium with sessions that won't be open to the public.

Advertisement

U.S. Soccer sporting director Matt Crocker said in a statement, "We are delighted to have Great Park as our training site for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The facilities are simply outstanding and will provide the perfect training environment for our team to prepare to be successful at the World Cup."

Irvine Mayor Larry Agran said in a statement, "We are honored that the U.S. Men's National Team has chosen to train at the Great Park during the FIFA World Cup. This decision reflects the caliber of the Great Park Championship Soccer Stadium and the professionalism of the staff who operate it. Irvine is proud to welcome the players, coaches, and supporters from around the world to our great city for one of the world's most celebrated sporting events."

According to The Athletic, U.S. Soccer first looked to UC Irvine, but the university and FIFA didn't reach an agreement on the proposal. U.S. Soccer then pivoted across town to Great Park.

The USMNT has four friendly matchups scheduled ahead of the World Cup: March 28 vs. Belgium and March 31 vs. Portugal, both in Atlanta; May 31 vs. Senegal in Charlotte; and June 6 vs. Germany in Chicago.

The U.S. opens World Cup Group D action against Paraguay on June 12 in Inglewood, then faces Australia on June 19 in Seattle. The USMNT's final group game, on June 25 in Inglewood, will be against the winner of a UEFA playoff, either Slovakia, Kosovo, Turkey or Romania.

--Field Level Media

USMNT chooses Irvine, Calif., for World Cup base

The U.S. men's national team will set up its World Cup training base at Great Park Sports Complex in Irvine, Calif...
USA stunned by Italy, needs help to reach WBC quarterfinals

Kyle Teel, Sam Antonacci and Jac Caglianone all homered for Italy, which moved to the top of the World Baseball Classic Pool B standings by holding on to upset the United States 8-6 on Tuesday night in Houston.

Field Level Media

Italy, which raced out to an 8-0 lead before Team USA rallied in the final four innings, is 3-0 in Pool B play and would clinch a spot in the quarterfinals with a win against Mexico in Wednesday's finale.

An Italy win Wednesday would secure the final Pool B spot for Team USA, which finished 3-1.

If Mexico (2-1) beats Italy, those teams along with the United States will finish Pool B at 3-1. The first tiebreaker is head-to-head record, which would be 1-1 for all three teams. The second tiebreaker is the fewest runs per out in head-to-head games.

Team USA allowed 11 runs against Italy and Mexico and recorded 54 outs (.2037 runs per out), while Mexico got 24 outs against Team USA and gave up five runs (.2083 runs per out). Italy yielded six runs against Team USA on Tuesday over 27 outs (.2222 runs per out).

As a result, Team USA needs Italy to win, which would eliminate Mexico, or Mexico to win while allowing at least five runs (assuming the game ends in nine innings). Mexico and Italy would advance, eliminating the United States, if Mexico wins and permits four or fewer runs in a nine-inning game.

Italy starter Michael Lorenzen earned the win, allowing two hits and one walk while striking out two over 4 2/3 scoreless innings.

Advertisement

Teel hit a solo blast and Antonacci added a two-run homer off Team USA starter Nolan McLean in the second. Caglianone hit a two-run shot in the fourth off Ryan Yarborough before Italy added three more runs in the sixth. J.J. D'Orazio scored on an error by Team USA pitcher Brad Keller and Dante Nori lofted a sacrifice fly before Antonacci scored on Keller's wild pitch.

Gunnar Henderson's solo shot began Team USA's comeback bid in the sixth before Pete Crow-Armstrong hit the first of his two homers, a three-run blast, in the seventh to make it 8-4. Roman Anthony had an RBI single in the eighth and Crow-Armstrong went deep with one out in the ninth off Ron Marinaccio to cut the deficit to 8-6.

Greg Weissert entered and gave up a single to Bobby Witt Jr. before striking out Henderson and Team USA captain Aaron Judge to earn the save.

Teel was 2-for-2 before exiting with a leg injury following a sixth-inning double. Caglianone also had two of Italy's six hits.

Witt and Will Smith had two hits apiece for Team USA, which posted 11 hits.

McLean gave up three runs on two hits and two walks while striking out four over three innings.

--Field Level Media

USA stunned by Italy, needs help to reach WBC quarterfinals

Kyle Teel, Sam Antonacci and Jac Caglianone all homered for Italy, which moved to the top of the World Baseball Classi...

 

NEO JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com